Today is Abraham Lincoln’s Birthday and many people throughout the country are celebrating our great 16th President. Politicians on both sides of the political aisle love to attribute their party to Lincoln in an attempt to have some of his greatness rub off on them. Lincoln, on today’s political spectrum, would have been considered a Conservative, although Liberals attach themselves to him and praise him because he was responsible for one of the largest increases in the Union. However, much of this was due to Lincoln’s staunch support of the Constitution of the United States, something we rarely hear about, much less see from politicians. Abraham Lincoln believed wholeheartedly “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” He believed that all men’s rights and freedoms were given to them by God, not by Government, a far cry from what we see today. Lincoln’s increase of the Union was to do one thing: ensure that all slaves be free and granted their God-given rights and freedoms, something the Constitution of the United States promises. The Constitution does not promise a Savior Government to provide financial security for individuals or for businesses, only that all men would have equal opportunity and for the physical protection from foreign and domestic enemies and justice for any who takes those freedoms and rights away. I wonder who protects us from the Government who takes those freedoms and rights away?
It is because of Lincoln’s view on limited Government, that some historians believe the “10 Cannots” were attributed to him, based on some of his thoughts, speeches, and ideas. However, others attribute it solely to a flyer that was sent out by a Conservative Group, one side containing a quote by Lincoln, the other the 10 Cannots by William J. H. Boetcker. The author of the 10 Cannots is William Boetcker, a Presbyterian pastor, who was an outspoken Conservative, you can read more on him HERE.
I believe in light of our current political situation, our current economic problems, in honor of Lincoln’s Birthday and his support of limited government, I would post William Boetcker’s 10 Cannot’s for us all to think on today…they are very powerful:
- You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
- You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
- You cannot help little men by tearing down big men.
- You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.
- You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
- You cannot establish sound security on borrowed money.
- You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
- You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than you earn.
- You cannot build character and courage by destroying men’s initiative and independence.
- You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they can and should do for themselves.
Terry Orzechowski says
Would it interest you that these quotes were listed in a book of fake quotes. Lincoln was the first Republican President and a life long liberal.
Terry Orzechowski says
Boller, Paul F., Jr., and John George. They Never Said It: A Book Of Fake Quotes, Misquotes, & Misleading Attributions (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 82-84, 145.
Terry Orzechowski says
The quotes were published in 1942 by William J. H. Boetcker, a Presbyterian minister. He released a pamphlet titled Lincoln On Limitations, which did include a Lincoln quote, but also added 10 statements written by Boetcker himself.
nick says
@Terry: If you would have read the entire post you would have seen that I gave the appropriate credit to William Boetcker. I wrote…
Thanks for the info though 🙂
Carol Sikler says
Way too long after posting this, but since I just found it, I’m going to go ahead and comment anyway. You are eloquently spoken and your writing should reflect it:
“politicians on both sides of the political aisle” (not “isle”)
“Lincoln, on today’s political spectrum…” (not “by today’s political spectrum”)
“due to Lincoln’s staunch support” (not “starch support”)
“Abraham Lincoln believed wholeheartedly” (not “whole heartily”)
“was to do one thing: ensure that all slaves…” (punctuation change)
“God-given rights” (punctuation change)
“the author of the 10 Cannots is William…” (punctuation change)
nick says
Thank you, Carol. I appreciate your feedback. I love writing, but I struggled with grammar in school. That’s not a good combination 🙂 I made all of the changes that you pointed out.